<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BlogNetNews.com &#187; Fraud &#171; Today's Most Clicked Blogs</title>
	<link>http://www.blognetnews.com/fraud/</link>
	<description>BlogNetNews.com &#187; Fraud</description>
	<generator>BlogNetNews.com</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<item>
		<title>10Q Detective: More on Novartis' Promising MS Drug Fingolimod</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetnews.com/fraud/go.php?http://10qdetective.blogspot.com/2009/12/more-on-novartis-promising-ms-drug.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:11:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://10qdetective.blogspot.com/2009/12/more-on-novartis-promising-ms-drug.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Novartis’ (NVS-$55.78) fingolimod, first in a new class of immunomodulatory drugs called S1P-receptor modulators, reduces circulating levels of white blood cells (by bottling them up in lymph nodes). Though effective in relapsing forms of MS, treatment with fingolimod – like all disease-modifying agents – is not without risk Skin cancer <a href="http://www.blognetnews.com/fraud/go.php?http://10qdetective.blogspot.com/2009/12/more-on-novartis-promising-ms-drug.html" class="postLink" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
		<title>White Collar Crime Prof Blog: False Statement Passport Statute Does Not Require Materiality</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetnews.com/fraud/go.php?http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2009/12/false-statement-on-passport-statute-does-not-require-materiality.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 01:12:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2009/12/false-statement-on-passport-statute-does-not-require-materiality.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	A defendant convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 1542, a statute pertaining to a false statement in an application for a passport, argued unsuccessfully that materiality was required. The Second Circuit held that unlike section 1001, materiality was not an element... <a href="http://www.blognetnews.com/fraud/go.php?http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2009/12/false-statement-on-passport-statute-does-not-require-materiality.html" class="postLink" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></description>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>

